Posts Tagged ‘docks’

Little help for marsh from eco-friendly dock designs

April 25, 2012

New dock designs intended to reduce damage to salt marshes are not much better than traditional docks, according to a recently completed study by Clark Alexander of Skidaway Institute of Oceanography. Alexander also concluded the compass orientation and height of a dock has more impact on the health of the salt marsh than the dock design or materials.

The problem is the shadow docks cast on the salt marsh vegetation beneath them. The marsh grass (Spartina alterniflora) does not flourish in reduced sunlight.  In recent years, alternative materials and designs have appeared on the dock-building market to try to mitigate this problem. Alexander tested three types of alternative material and designs – ThruFlow fiberglass-impregnated plastic grating; Gator Dock Fibergrate grating; and the DockRider Sundock, which uses a set of wooden rails and an electric trolley in place of traditional wood planking.

“These all sounded good,” said Alexander. “But what we didn’t know was if they actually worked effectively.”

To answer that question, Alexander conducted a three-year, two-part research project funded by a $195,488 grant from the Georgia Coastal Zone Management Program.

The first part of the study was to conduct field-based “before-and-after” studies of salt marshes where some of the new designs were being built. Alexander’s team collected samples and recorded conditions in the marsh before the docks were built and continued to monitor the salt marshes after they were completed.

In the second part of the study, Alexander and his team constructed four dock models, “mock docks”, using alternative materials on high ground at the Skidaway campus. The docks were placed in a field with unobstructed sunlight and were fitted with light meters that measured the amount of sunlight being received above and below each dock. The researchers measured the shadow footprint of the various dock designs over the course of two years.

Clark Alexander (r) and research team member Mike Robinson examine the light meter equipment beneath on of the mock docks.

“Because orientation is an important parameter in light transmission through these materials, we made the mock docks mobile, so we could re-oriented them during the four seasons to see the effects of orientation and seasonal sun angle” said Alexander.

They also adjusted the dock heights to assess the impact of height on light penetration to the ground below.

In the first part of the study, Alexander and his team examined three separate field sites – Turners Creek (ThruFlow decking), Shell Point Cove (Dockrider) and Betz Creek (traditional plank design) They measured the stem density of the marsh grass before the docks were constructed and then monitored it for two years after construction. Stem density in the dock shadow footprint decreased between 44 and 80 percent compared to nearby, non-dock sites.

The team also observed additional dock-related impacts. Some sections of salt marsh transitioned to denuded mudflats due to the marsh wrack that accumulated around the dock pilings.

The results of the field study were supported by the mock-dock project on the Skidaway campus. Seasonal measurements showed a significant reduction of the light needed to support the health of the marsh plants in the areas affected by the docks’ shadows.  At Skidaway Institute’s latitude, the elevation of the sun is high enough to allow sunlight to penetrate through the grated deck material only during the spring and summer, and even then, provides only about 10% more light than traditional plank decking.

The mock-dock project also documented two additional dock-shading impacts.  The compass orientation of a dock plays a significant role in the effect the dock has on the marsh. Docks that are oriented in a generally north-south direction have a much smaller shading impact than those oriented east-west. The height of the dock also has a significant effect. The duration of the shadow under the dock and the total light loss decreases as the height increases, up to 7 feet above the marsh surface, with smaller, less significant decreases above that height.

“The results of the two studies demonstrate that neither current alternative materials nor construction methods effectively negate the effects of dock shading in our region,” said Alexander. “However, the Dockrider system had one half to one third the shading impact of decked walkways in our study.”

“In addition to shading impacts, marsh wrack accumulation around dock and walkway pilings also negatively impacts the marsh and will be a problem with any piling-supported structure.”

The results of the study have been sent to the Department of Natural Resources, which will use these results to better manage the important coastal saltmarshes of Georgia.


Raising docks to new heights

February 1, 2010

Our campus “mock docks” grew a little taller today.

The purpose behind this project is to measure the effects different dock designs have on the underlying salt marsh. Earlier research indicated that the shadow cast by docks have a negative effect on the plant growth in the marsh surface in the dock’s “footprint.” Recently, dock designers have developed new designs and materials to help alleviate this problem. The questions are – do they work and how well?

As a part of this project, a Skidaway Institute team headed by professor Clark Alexander built a four  “mock docks” on our campus.

Three of the mock docks

One is constructed with traditional material and in a traditional design. The remaining three are of different design and materials. The docks are equipped with light meters to measure the light difference between the top of the dock and the footprint below. Over the past year or so, they have been adjusted to various orientations to capture the sun and shadow at different points of the compass and throughout the year. The next step is to obtain data for docks at varying heights.

Harry raises the platform with the fork lift as Lee Ann watches.

This afternoon research assistant Lee Ann DeLeo and fork-lift driver Harry Carter raised the existing dock models roughly two feet.

Lee Ann removes an old, shorter leg.

They lifted the deck structure off their bottom legs and replaced the legs with slightly longer ones.

Lee Ann checks the fit as the platform structure is lowered onto the new leg.

No, they are not sculptures!

August 4, 2008

We have some weird looking structures on our campus these days. Whereas our carpenter, Harry Carter, may consider them works of art, that is not their real purpose. These “mock docks” are part of a research project by one of our scientists, Clark Alexander.

Clark Alexander (right) and research tech Mike Robinson work with light sensors beneath one mock dock.

Clark Alexander (right) and research tech Mike Robinson work with light sensors beneath one mock dock.

He is trying to determine what effect some new dock designs and materials have on the salt marsh they cross.

The issue all goes back to earlier research by Clark and other scientists that has shown the shadow cast by docks has a detrimental effect on the salt marsh vegetation underneath and nearby. In recent years, the various regulatory agencies have been stricter about issuing new dock permits, especially for private docks. In reaction to that, some dock manufacturers have come up with some alternate designs and alternate materials to mitigate the docks’ impact. The goal is to create a dock structure with either a smaller shadow footprint or a lighter shadow.

Dockrider dock

Dockrider dock

One new design, the Dockrider (above), does not have a walking platform. Instead of the traditional platform of 1×6″ planks, the dock is an open framework. To get from the high ground to the terminal platform, an electic cart is used. It rides back and forth on the open frame.

Two other manufacturers are using a metal or plastic grate for the platform.

Plastic grate dock

Plastic grate dock

Metal grate dock

Metal grate dock

This allows some light to pass through.

The question now is, “Do they actually work as advertised?” With the cooperation of the dock suppliers, Clark has had our shop crew build these dock replicas and place them in an open, unshaded field on our campus. Clark plans to keep these mock docks in place for the next two years, moving them around the points of the compass throughout the seasons, periodically measuring the light beneath and to the sides nearby. He’ll them raise and lower them to get data on how the height of the docks affect the shadow.

We’ll let you know how things develop.